Contents
1. The race against breast cancer
   
2.

What's new in breast cancer research?

The truth about Herceptin

   
3.

Radiotherapy in breast cancer treatment

Nuts and bolts of mammography

   
4.

PET-CT in oncology

Role of prophylactic mastectomy in breast cancer

   
5.

Breast conservation and breast reconstruction

Genetics of breast cancer

   
6.

Risk assessment and chemoprevention

Hormone receptors in breast cancer - from bench to bedside

   
  NCC Tumour Board Files
   
  Onco Quiz
   
  NCC Roundup
   
 

Pharmacy Tips

   
  Breast Cancer Overview
   
  Staff Directory
   
  Contact
   

 

 

Top

 

What's new in breast cancer research?

A summary of the latest developments that are likely to influence patient care

Screening
Studies show that MRI of the breasts is more sensitive in screening women from high-risk families than mammography. Protein chip mass spectrometry detects unique protein profiles in blood samples of breast and ovarian cancer patients. Sensitivity and specificity of this technique is now approaching that of mammography.

Surgery
Sentinel lymph node biopsy will evolve further, sparing patients the morbidity of axillary lymph node dissection. Minimally invasive surgery is likely to be developed further.

With further improvements, screening tests using a few blood drops could be developed to differentiate non-invasive from invasive cancers.


Systemic treatments

The use of genomic and proteomic profiling of tumours to tailor therapies for patients will be established in a few years. Patients with low risk of relapse would be spared the toxicity of chemotherapy, while those at higher risk could be given more active regimens.The role of new chemotherapy
drugs is being established. The use of taxanes in neo-adjuvant and adjuvant regimens is being defined to increase operability and reduce the risk of relapse. New ways to administer chemotherapy are being studied. Recent studies show that giving chemotherapy drugs one at a time over shorter intervals (using growth factors to aid in bone marrow recovery) might be more beneficial. However, this will make treatment more expensive.

The use of monoclonal antibodies such as Herceptin to treat patients with advanced cancer is established. Clinical trials are being carried out to test how useful the antibodies are for adjuvant treatment. For low-risk patients struck with hormone responsive tumours, hormonal therapy works as well as chemotherapy. The use of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy is being re-evaluated to spare many patients the side effects of chemotherapy without any significant loss of efficacy.

In fact, hormonal therapy may be more important for women than chemotherapy. New hormonal agents with greater activity and fewer side effects are available to treat advanced diseases, albeit at a greater cost. The role of these drugs in adjuvant treatment is being defined.

Bisphosphonates have an established role in treating patients with advanced breast cancer affecting bones. These drugs not only cut risk of fractures, but also make radiation therapy unnecessary. Presently, the use of these drugs as adjuvant treatment is being studied.


Dr Bhupinder Mann
Senior Consultant
Medical Oncology



The truth about Herceptin

The drug - a genetically engineered version of human antibody - specifically targets cancer cells.

Trastuzumab (Herceptin™) is the star in the molecular war in breast cancer targeted therapy. It is a humanised antibody with a small murine antigen-binding component, directed against HER2.

Her1, Her2, Her3 and Her4 are four transmembrane receptors that belong to the tyrosine kinase (TK) family. The TK family of receptors, when stimulated by ligand binding, will trigger multiple intracellular pathways that increase proliferation, resistance to apoptosis and increase angiogenesis of cancer cells. The specific target of trastuzumab is Her2 (also called erbB2). The related Her1 is also known as EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor), the site of action for gefitinib (Iressa™), a new drug in lung cancer. Her2 is over-expressed in about 25% of breast cancers and is linked to poor clinical outcomes. The most reliable method of detecting Her2 over-expression without high false positive rates is by fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). In preclinical studies, there was loss of Her2 expression and tumour inhibition in cell lines exposed to trastuzumab.

After showing acceptable toxicity profile in phase 1 trials, two trials confirmed clinical efficacy of trastuzumab. The overall response rate was 15% when used alone in pre-treated women with metastatic breast cancer in a phase 2 trial. In phase 3 trials, when immunotherapy was combined with conventional chemotherapy, a higher response rate (50% vs. 32% p<0.001) and longer median survival was noted (25.1 months vs. 20.3 months p=0.01). Cardiac dysfunction is the most important toxicity.

The optimal combination has not yet been found. The optimal duration of trastuzumab treatment is not clear either. Pre-clinical studies suggested that chronic administration is required, as stopping treatment resulted in resumption of Her2 overexpression and increased cellular proliferation. However, no clinical study has convincingly shown this to be true.

Studies on the adjuvant use of trastuzumab are being done to study how recurrences can be prevented and to prolong life span. Presently, NCC is participating in one of these trials and we hope to see trastuzumab make further inroads when it is combined with other agents administered in an optimal schedule.


Dr Donald Poon
Registrar
Medical Oncology